<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Books and The Parchments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Reflections on Christian Theology and Devotion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:23:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Know Yourself by Michael Riley</title>
		<link>http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/2009/09/09/know-yourself/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Your illustration about the model ship is compelling. Thanks for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your illustration about the model ship is compelling. Thanks for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Know Yourself by Herbert Yates</title>
		<link>http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/2009/09/09/know-yourself/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Herbert Yates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your insight on self.  I was beneficial and helpful.  It causes me to have a desire to know God better whenever I get confused by &quot;self&quot;.

Herb yates</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your insight on self.  I was beneficial and helpful.  It causes me to have a desire to know God better whenever I get confused by &#8220;self&#8221;.</p>
<p>Herb yates</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Danger of Spiritual Pretense by peacecrusader</title>
		<link>http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/2009/06/30/the-danger-of-spiritual-pretense/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>peacecrusader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/?p=52#comment-54</guid>
		<description>20090813.1210a

Did you know that the fig tree tells us when the crucifixion happened?  The Holy Spirit revealed to us (plural) that Jesus was crucified on August 17.  I heard this revelation in 1983 but it was only from 1999 to 2003 that I checked whether there is any ring of truth in it or not.  True enough, the revelation is correct.  

August is a summer month.   The fig tree put on leaves and its fruits are harvested during summer.   The story of this cursing occurred during summer.   Jesus must have be crucified in summer and not in spring.  I posted a blog at wordpress relating the parable of the fig tree to the crucifixion.  Please read my blog.  Your comments are most welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20090813.1210a</p>
<p>Did you know that the fig tree tells us when the crucifixion happened?  The Holy Spirit revealed to us (plural) that Jesus was crucified on August 17.  I heard this revelation in 1983 but it was only from 1999 to 2003 that I checked whether there is any ring of truth in it or not.  True enough, the revelation is correct.  </p>
<p>August is a summer month.   The fig tree put on leaves and its fruits are harvested during summer.   The story of this cursing occurred during summer.   Jesus must have be crucified in summer and not in spring.  I posted a blog at wordpress relating the parable of the fig tree to the crucifixion.  Please read my blog.  Your comments are most welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Really Counts? by Gayle Thompson</title>
		<link>http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/2008/10/08/what-really-counts/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayle Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 00:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/?p=35#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Thank you Pastor TJ for a timely reminder. Throughout this election year, and the challenge of our economy I&#039;ve been discouraged to hear and read all the comments of Christians so &quot;caught up&quot; in politics and finanical downturns. We are studying Habakkuk 3:17-19 in church to help keep our thoughts on what really is TRUE.  &quot;Though the fig tree should not blossom and there be no fruit on the vines, through the yield of the olive shouild fail and the fields produce no food, though the flock should be cut off from the fold and there be no cattle in the stalls, Yet I will exult in the Lord, I will rejoice in the God of my salvation.  The Lord God is my strength, and He has made my feet like hinds feet, and makes me walk on my high places.&quot; God bless you for standing strong in your pulpit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Pastor TJ for a timely reminder. Throughout this election year, and the challenge of our economy I&#8217;ve been discouraged to hear and read all the comments of Christians so &#8220;caught up&#8221; in politics and finanical downturns. We are studying Habakkuk 3:17-19 in church to help keep our thoughts on what really is TRUE.  &#8220;Though the fig tree should not blossom and there be no fruit on the vines, through the yield of the olive shouild fail and the fields produce no food, though the flock should be cut off from the fold and there be no cattle in the stalls, Yet I will exult in the Lord, I will rejoice in the God of my salvation.  The Lord God is my strength, and He has made my feet like hinds feet, and makes me walk on my high places.&#8221; God bless you for standing strong in your pulpit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gospelless Gospel Songs by Bradley McKenzie</title>
		<link>http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/gospelless-gospel-songs/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley McKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-47</guid>
		<description>T.J., I believe that the areas of our agreement far exceed the area of our disagreement. However, while you and I are both concerned about shallow worship, I believe that we should also be concerned that Christian men contemplate too infrequently and esteem too lightly what might be termed &quot;feminine attributes&quot; of Christ. I am not a student of modern church history, so if that is the official language of liberalism or of cults, I am willing to distance myself from the terminology immediately. But I maintain that admiring Jesus&#039; &quot;sweetness&quot; is not unworthy of His holy character. Perhaps we have lost sight of how masculine “feminine” attributes really are. A true Man said, “Come unto me,” “weep not,” “It is I, be not afraid,” “Suffer the little children to come unto me,” etc. Would we not agree that He has a pleasing disposition and is lovable? Is that not one of the magnificent rays emanating from His multifaceted character? For that matter, would we deny that the Name that means “Yahweh saves” is lovable? I think not. The songwriter expressed what he meant in the first verse when he said that “Jesus” was a name he most loved to hear, that was dearest to his heart, that divine name, that precious name. 

No doubt there are songs that exude more robust doctrine from every pore, though in some cases they were written by women. We felt that &quot;Before the Throne of God Above,&quot; despite two matters of doctrinal imprecision which we honed, was worthy of every effort to translate into German and publish in a songbook. We ended up investing scores of hours getting that text &quot;right.&quot; So, yes, a high standard of worship is important to us, but included in that high standard should be a healthy dose of fond affection (1 Corinthians 16:22 where “philei” is used). 

In closing, let’s face it, scarcely anything we produce will be enduring, except as it is laid up in heaven. Many a song in Lutheran hymnals of past centuries bears silent testimony to this truth. If anything deserved to have endured, they did. Eternity will tell, but some glad day, when the possibility of hypocritical sweetness is long forgotten and only true sweetness abides, we may join in a fervent chorus: “Jesus is the sweetest name I know.” (If it will sweeten the deal, try singing “dearest” instead of “sweetest.”) 

I’d love to get in on a music conference you speak at, and perhaps someday I will be able to get over to Camp Joy in January. Meanwhile, keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T.J., I believe that the areas of our agreement far exceed the area of our disagreement. However, while you and I are both concerned about shallow worship, I believe that we should also be concerned that Christian men contemplate too infrequently and esteem too lightly what might be termed &#8220;feminine attributes&#8221; of Christ. I am not a student of modern church history, so if that is the official language of liberalism or of cults, I am willing to distance myself from the terminology immediately. But I maintain that admiring Jesus&#8217; &#8220;sweetness&#8221; is not unworthy of His holy character. Perhaps we have lost sight of how masculine “feminine” attributes really are. A true Man said, “Come unto me,” “weep not,” “It is I, be not afraid,” “Suffer the little children to come unto me,” etc. Would we not agree that He has a pleasing disposition and is lovable? Is that not one of the magnificent rays emanating from His multifaceted character? For that matter, would we deny that the Name that means “Yahweh saves” is lovable? I think not. The songwriter expressed what he meant in the first verse when he said that “Jesus” was a name he most loved to hear, that was dearest to his heart, that divine name, that precious name. </p>
<p>No doubt there are songs that exude more robust doctrine from every pore, though in some cases they were written by women. We felt that &#8220;Before the Throne of God Above,&#8221; despite two matters of doctrinal imprecision which we honed, was worthy of every effort to translate into German and publish in a songbook. We ended up investing scores of hours getting that text &#8220;right.&#8221; So, yes, a high standard of worship is important to us, but included in that high standard should be a healthy dose of fond affection (1 Corinthians 16:22 where “philei” is used). </p>
<p>In closing, let’s face it, scarcely anything we produce will be enduring, except as it is laid up in heaven. Many a song in Lutheran hymnals of past centuries bears silent testimony to this truth. If anything deserved to have endured, they did. Eternity will tell, but some glad day, when the possibility of hypocritical sweetness is long forgotten and only true sweetness abides, we may join in a fervent chorus: “Jesus is the sweetest name I know.” (If it will sweeten the deal, try singing “dearest” instead of “sweetest.”) </p>
<p>I’d love to get in on a music conference you speak at, and perhaps someday I will be able to get over to Camp Joy in January. Meanwhile, keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gospelless Gospel Songs by Mike&#8217;s Weblog &#187; When Theology Attacks!</title>
		<link>http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/gospelless-gospel-songs/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike&#8217;s Weblog &#187; When Theology Attacks!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-46</guid>
		<description>[...] For those of you who think my analysis of heretic hymns is too harsh. I offer this. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For those of you who think my analysis of heretic hymns is too harsh. I offer this. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gospelless Gospel Songs by tjklapperich</title>
		<link>http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/gospelless-gospel-songs/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>tjklapperich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Brad

I would agree that if the song said, &quot;a reason&quot; instead of &quot;the reason,&quot; it would be a great improvement.  However, it does say, &quot;the reason.&quot;  Perhaps I am not allowing for enough poetic license and I should understand it as &quot;a reason.&quot;  However, even with that allowance, I think that being sweet (nice), is not the same as the biblical concept of kindness.  I have had many people be sweet to me, but they were not always kind to me.  The American Heritage Dictionary defines sweet as, &quot;Having a pleasing disposition, lovable.&quot; With this definition this would mean the song is saying that I love Jesus because he is nice and lovable.  That is a very shallow way to express love for Christ.  Additionally, I think Luke 4:22 is talking about Jesus preaching being appreciated for its rhetoric and eloquence more than talking about Jesus being nice.  The word for gracious is charis, the common word for grace in the New Testament.

The other issue I have with the song is the concept of Jesus&#039; name being sweet.  The name of Jesus or God in the Bible is usually used to communicate his reputation and his glory.  I don&#039;t understand the connection between God&#039;s glory and niceness.  I am not trying to over parse the song, but it seems to be saying that I love Jesus because his glory is nice.  That is a very strange sentiment.  I don&#039;t think the song is evil, but simply not enduring.  I appreciate that many people like the song, but I think our standards for worship have been too low.  

Much of the false teaching we contend with today came out of the 19th and early 20th centuries:  Mormonism, JWs, the Campbellites, Seventh Day Adventists, Charismaticism, and Revivalism all come out of that period.  Unfortunately, even Evangelical Christians were impacted by the spirit of that age (just as we are by ours) and it is reflected in too many of the songs in our hymnal.  Additionally, during the Victorian Era many of the Christian virtues were replaced by feminine virtues.  That may seem harmless enough to some, but it has feminized our churches and replaced Christian godliness with a feminine emphasis on nurture and niceness.  

I hope you understand I am not on a crusade to destroy Gospel Songs, but I want folks to analyze all of our music to consider whether it is biblical or not.  I hope I have not been over zealous. 

Thank you for your comments Brad.  I appreciate your service for the Lord in Germany.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad</p>
<p>I would agree that if the song said, &#8220;a reason&#8221; instead of &#8220;the reason,&#8221; it would be a great improvement.  However, it does say, &#8220;the reason.&#8221;  Perhaps I am not allowing for enough poetic license and I should understand it as &#8220;a reason.&#8221;  However, even with that allowance, I think that being sweet (nice), is not the same as the biblical concept of kindness.  I have had many people be sweet to me, but they were not always kind to me.  The American Heritage Dictionary defines sweet as, &#8220;Having a pleasing disposition, lovable.&#8221; With this definition this would mean the song is saying that I love Jesus because he is nice and lovable.  That is a very shallow way to express love for Christ.  Additionally, I think Luke 4:22 is talking about Jesus preaching being appreciated for its rhetoric and eloquence more than talking about Jesus being nice.  The word for gracious is charis, the common word for grace in the New Testament.</p>
<p>The other issue I have with the song is the concept of Jesus&#8217; name being sweet.  The name of Jesus or God in the Bible is usually used to communicate his reputation and his glory.  I don&#8217;t understand the connection between God&#8217;s glory and niceness.  I am not trying to over parse the song, but it seems to be saying that I love Jesus because his glory is nice.  That is a very strange sentiment.  I don&#8217;t think the song is evil, but simply not enduring.  I appreciate that many people like the song, but I think our standards for worship have been too low.  </p>
<p>Much of the false teaching we contend with today came out of the 19th and early 20th centuries:  Mormonism, JWs, the Campbellites, Seventh Day Adventists, Charismaticism, and Revivalism all come out of that period.  Unfortunately, even Evangelical Christians were impacted by the spirit of that age (just as we are by ours) and it is reflected in too many of the songs in our hymnal.  Additionally, during the Victorian Era many of the Christian virtues were replaced by feminine virtues.  That may seem harmless enough to some, but it has feminized our churches and replaced Christian godliness with a feminine emphasis on nurture and niceness.  </p>
<p>I hope you understand I am not on a crusade to destroy Gospel Songs, but I want folks to analyze all of our music to consider whether it is biblical or not.  I hope I have not been over zealous. </p>
<p>Thank you for your comments Brad.  I appreciate your service for the Lord in Germany.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gospelless Gospel Songs by Bradley McKenzie</title>
		<link>http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/gospelless-gospel-songs/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley McKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 05:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Perhaps if only one word were changed the chorus would be more acceptable. &quot;And that&#039;s a [not &quot;the&quot;] reason why I love him so.&quot; Certainly the &quot;sweetness&quot; of Jesus is not &quot;the&quot; primary reason that I love Him, yet it is certainly one of the many reasons that I love Him and that &quot;He is so precious to me.&quot; When I think of someone being &quot;sweet&quot; I perceive him as being kind and gracious. At least, that is what I am encouraging my children to be when I say to them, &quot;Be sweet!&quot; That is, &quot;Be like Jesus.&quot; Luke 4:22 says that the people &quot;wondered at the gracious words which proceeded out of [Jesus&#039;] mouth.&quot; A quick look at Strong&#039;s definitive lexicon--I jest--reveals: &quot;that which affords ... sweetness....&quot; So, perhaps I am feeling a bit defensive of a beloved song, but I think that in all our quest for doctrinal correctness--and I in no wise want to play that down--we should continue to foster--how you say?--&quot;religious affection.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps if only one word were changed the chorus would be more acceptable. &#8220;And that&#8217;s a [not "the"] reason why I love him so.&#8221; Certainly the &#8220;sweetness&#8221; of Jesus is not &#8220;the&#8221; primary reason that I love Him, yet it is certainly one of the many reasons that I love Him and that &#8220;He is so precious to me.&#8221; When I think of someone being &#8220;sweet&#8221; I perceive him as being kind and gracious. At least, that is what I am encouraging my children to be when I say to them, &#8220;Be sweet!&#8221; That is, &#8220;Be like Jesus.&#8221; Luke 4:22 says that the people &#8220;wondered at the gracious words which proceeded out of [Jesus'] mouth.&#8221; A quick look at Strong&#8217;s definitive lexicon&#8211;I jest&#8211;reveals: &#8220;that which affords &#8230; sweetness&#8230;.&#8221; So, perhaps I am feeling a bit defensive of a beloved song, but I think that in all our quest for doctrinal correctness&#8211;and I in no wise want to play that down&#8211;we should continue to foster&#8211;how you say?&#8211;&#8221;religious affection.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gospelless Gospel Songs by Gospelless Gospel Songs &#124; Religious Affections Ministries</title>
		<link>http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/gospelless-gospel-songs/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Gospelless Gospel Songs &#124; Religious Affections Ministries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[...] If you&#039;re new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. You can also subscribe by e-mail. Thanks for visiting!T. J. Klapperich with some excellent commentary. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you&#8217;re new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. You can also subscribe by e-mail. Thanks for visiting!T. J. Klapperich with some excellent commentary. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making Jesus Relevant! by Bumper Sticker Relevance &#124; Religious Affections Ministries</title>
		<link>http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/2008/09/30/making-jesus-relevant/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Bumper Sticker Relevance &#124; Religious Affections Ministries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjklapperich.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-38</guid>
		<description>[...] If you&#039;re new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. You can also subscribe by e-mail. Thanks for visiting!T. J. Klapperich on religion and relevance. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you&#8217;re new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. You can also subscribe by e-mail. Thanks for visiting!T. J. Klapperich on religion and relevance. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
